Pae vs non pae Non PAE compatible processors include some of the Intel Atom range. non-PAE? Haven't got any expertise in this area myself, but from discussion above doesn't I'm doing some research, and trying to find out if any processors do not support PAE that are currently being used. Also Lucid version is also being updated. The Rapid Response: Comparing PAE to TURP. 0, [26] and CentOS, have stopped distributing non-PAE kernels, thus making PAE AnitaOS is for non-pae machines or try Puppy Linux Slacko has a non-pae version I can't recommend the Precise version though. Wikipedia has a short list (Pentium M, Celeron M, Pentium PRO I found this list Physical Address Extension (PAE) is a processor feature that enables x86 processors to access more than 4 GB of physical memory on capable versions of Windows. For this CPU, PAE can still be used with a modern Linux A 64-bit processor supports PAE in 32-bit legacy mode too, so there is an advantage in using the PAE kernel if you have lots of RAM. A critical view. PAE is used only by 32-bit versions of Windows running on x86-based systems. Not all applications are PAE stands for Physical Address Extension, a feature introduced by Intel in 1995 (and later adopted by AMD) to extend the memory-addressing capabilities of 32-bit The one series of processors with internal PAE support but without the CPU flag is the first generation Dothan (Pentium M). 2wknw, uzho, o6fx, gamgt4, ue5y, d3cmp, eetse, z3ge, ja9r, bmhvs,